I got an interesting comment on my last post. Well actually I got several interesting comments, but the one that tickled the old grey cells most was this one;
interested to hear more about what’s different about
your views as a ‘birthright’ Friend, I didn’t realise that such a concept existed
anymore!{)}
Well you’re right of course! The concept is utterly irrelevant these days, and this is a Good Thing.
From quaker.org.uk (For those of you who think I’m making up words
here);
In the past children of Quaker parents automatically became
members of the Society and were known as “birthright Friends” but
nowadays this form of membership no longer exists.
The form of membership doesn’t exist but the phrase still remains. It’s not a ‘fossil’ because the original meaning and new meaning are still within common memory and usage respectively, but it’s verging on it. These days it’s only used as shorthand for ‘person who happened to be born into a Quaker family/meeting’ which is, I hope you’ll agree, arduous and clanky.